Model Rule 1.5(e)MN
Minnesota fee division
Minnesota tracks the Model Rule. Two lawyers may divide a fee if the split matches the work or each takes joint responsibility, you agree to the arrangement including each share, that agreement is confirmed in writing, and the total is reasonable.
Last checked Sep 4, 2026 · LawyerUnc editorial. Educational only, not legal advice.
- The rule
- Minn. R. Prof. Cond. 1.5(e)
- What you sign
- The client agrees to the arrangement, including the share each lawyer will receive, and the agreement is confirmed in writing. The total fee is reasonable.
- How the split is allowed
- Proportion to services performed, or each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation.
- Any cap on the referring share
- No Florida-style 25% cap. The total fee must be reasonable. Minnesota no-fault auto is a different statute. Do not mix it with this rule.
- Who is not in the fee
- A nonlawyer does not take a percentage of the recovery. Hosting, ads, and software get a flat or metered bill. That is ABA Model Rule 5.4 in substance, and every state on this desk follows it.
For the lawyer on the other end
Minnesota 1.5(e) is the ABA text, as amended through 2011. Do not import Alabama's forwarding-fee path or Louisiana's meaningful-services requirement.
PIP on a Minnesota crash is the crash page. It is not a fee-division shortcut.